I was thinking of adding a “non-invasive fully mental telepathy system” (The telepathy system will only allow sharing of “mental “expression of “what seems like audio””” (such as one's “inner voice” or music being “mentally played”)) set up in someone else's simulated world (a world that, like Eric's world, has “full mental/thought privacy” because “having a lack of “mental/thought privacy”” was made impossible) (“””Full Mental Privacy” Telepathy” capability” example: a “telepathy system” that lets one “mentally speak” while having “mental background music” playing while “said one” is “mentally speaking” but “said one” can share the “mental speech” part while not sharing the “””mental background music” that “said one” is playing” during said “mental speaking””) but I found that there's no way for “fully mental telepathy” to be completely non-invasive.

The question I asked myself is:

Is a “mental telepathy system” that lets one share “mental “expression of “what seems like audio””” in real time, but only the parts of the “mental “expression of “what seems like audio””” that they want to share (for example: “mental background music” playing while “said one” is “mentally speaking” but “said one” can share the “mental speech” part while not sharing the “mental background music” that “said one” is playing during said “mental speaking”) possible?

The only way to “make that work in the simulation” would be for an ai program to be always reading everybody's “brain data” to deliver the “”parts of “mental speech”” and “parts of “imagined things” to “who the ai is aware (because of the brain data) that the person wants to communicate with”””.

If that ai doesn't make it's “presence (and what it does)” known, then “everyone in the simulation” would just think it's “non-invasive mental telepathy”.

That world would make the task of “teaching a class” insanely difficult. A world of cheaters. And I guess it would be a “gossip fest”.

I'll make it so that, in that “world or “worlds like that””, “”there is a device, the size of a pen”, that was placed in everybody's house, that when used on anyone, magically turns telepathy “on or off (unable to “send and/or receive” “telepathic communication”)” for that individual”. It can also be used to check the status of “if telepathy is already “on or off”” for any individual. This will make “cheating in school” less doable. Whenever a “person who isn't simulated” uses the “pen device”, that person will be asked, by ai, for that person's consent for to have “mental-privacy-invasive technology” to be used on that person. If consent is given, then that person can use the “telepathy system”. The range that one can “telepathically communicate” is within a 100ft radius from “said one's” exact current location.

If psychics are able to know all of “someone else's” “mental/thought activity”, and if there is a “device that is the size of a pen” which can be used to turn psychic “on or off” for any individual, then if a psychic “plays the board game “Chess”” against someone with “said someone's” “psychic” turned off, “the psychic” has “”unfair advantages” like knowing ““said psychic's” opponent's” “every strategy” at all times”. The “pen-sized device” makes things fair. Without the “pen-sized device”, “”a world where “”some people are psychic” and “other people are not psychic”””, is unfair”. ““Everyone not having the “”same psychic abilities” (mind-reading, telepathy, telekinesis, etc.) as each other”” is unfair”. To keep things fair, I would make everyone “equally psychic” (which is “hive mind” “if said “psychic” includes mind-reading and/or if “said “psychic”” includes knowing “someone else's” “mental/thought activity””), or I would set up my preferred “”telepathy system” that I mentioned earlier”. “Hive mind” lacks things like “the ability to have surprise birthday parties” and it causes a “”permanent inability to avoid toxicity of other people” due to inability to not know everyone's “mental/thought activity””. It would also make things like “”showing off” and “impressing people”” much less doable. It would really take away from “originality and individuality” as they are today.