The first argument I come across when debating anarchism is "so you don't believe in the human nature".

My response is "no"

I don't believe that humans are fundamentally good. Some people are bad by nature. Some people are dumb. Most people are jealous. Some people are greedy. The list goes on.

To leave everything on natural human decency, at least in a big group like a society, is a bad idea. Without some sort of code like laws or even social norms, some people will do as they please and cause havoc. Some will kill. Some will steal. Some will destroy.

Sure, most will be nice and respectful but there are always bad apples.

-----

After some recommendations, I'll include some of Spain's anarchist history. From what I've read, Spain's anarchism was a good example of anarchism. Most of them were nice and respectful. Still, some became terrorists, which basically represent the bad apples.

Overall, I must say that I don't believe that anarchism is the solution but that the more freedom we have while conserving a moral/civil code.