《I remember the time》Chapter 6: Freedom of speeches, leaches, beaches, and teachas.....I tried to rhyme
Advertisement
We, as a population, have evolved to a point that we have set laws for what someone can and can’t say about a person or group. During WWII, most countries were very harsh to their citizens. For example, in the article “Freedom of Thought and Mental Integrity” in Frontiers in Neuroscience by Andrea Lavazza, it brings a story written by Jorge Luis Borges, called The Secret Miracle . The story was about up a man named Hladik, a Jewish writer living in Nazi Germany, that was arrested and sentenced to death because he was writing a play that went against common German beliefs called The Enemies.
You might be thinking, “What exactly are the rules to freedom of speech?” Well, inn Bastiaan Rutjen’s article “What Does Free Speech Mean” in Belief Systems and the Perception of Reality, it entails that not saluting to the flag. It also includes wearing black armbands to protest a war, and symbolic speech are included in the right of freedom of speech.
In some ways, freedom of speech can be seen as a barrier between races because one group may feel that it is oppressed, so it has to speak loudly. In Gina Roussos’s article “Hate Speech is in the Eye of the Beholder” from the journal Social Psychological and Personality Science, the author states that in a project, researchers gathered participants to decide if a poster relating to their race was entitled to be under freedom of speech. One poster was addressed to “white trash” while the other was directed towards “n**gers”. At the end of the project, they had discovered that people of color had said that the poster against “white trash” was acceptable while the poster talking about “n**gers” was unacceptable because it was “racist”. The people conducting the study came up with the answer that people would go towards the poster they felt was right based upon how they felt about certain words on the posters similarly to trigger words. After I read this article I thought, “What exactly is freedom of speech if something can be blocked for having trigger words?”
In a article called “Freedom of Thought and Mental Integrity,” the writer described freedom of speech as the same as freedom of thought. The author also went on to write that if freedom of thought is taken over then that would mean there is a way to control what can and can’t be said to a higher level (3).
In the article “What Does Free Speech Mean?” in which the cans and cannots of freedom of speech are explained, the case United States v. Eichman, 496 U.S. 310 from 1990 is considered as something that should be taken away. The law had added that symbolic messages could be included into the classification of freedom of speech. This idea of symbolism includes burning the flag in protest. Many people were outraged about this because they felt that burning the flag was a sign of treason and not a form of protest (to which I agree). There are other laws that are included as freedom of speech like not to salute the flag, students wearing black armbands to protest a war, and using offensive words and phrases to convey political messages (1). (Most of these laws are sensible, but a few aren’t because if you really think about it, they could be considered as treacherous acts against the country).
Advertisement
Most actions aren’t included as freedom of speech because they either conflict with the set laws or have negative effects on people. Some things that are not considered freedom of speech is to incite actions that would harm others (e.g. yelling fire in a crowded movie theater), making obscene materials (e.g. handing out pamphlets for prostitution rings), and even burning draft cards as an anti-war protest (Routledge 1). The only law that conflicts with burning draft cards is burning the flag (which I think both are treacherous acts).
You might be thinking, “Who even comes up with these rules?” Well, this may come as a shocker, but freedom of speech was decided in the First Amendment. Yes, the U.S. government thought of what was and wasn’t right even though it had not included the abolishment of slavery until 1865. Not all of the laws were made exactly when the First Amendment was made. New laws are being made every year because new things are being introduced every second of every day. Almost all of the new laws were decided upon by the U.S. Supreme Court. The U.S. Supreme Court hears more than 100 cases within a year, but it is only heard because once it’s heard, it goes through a process of “Is this worth our time?”
The idea that someone or a group of people could control what you could and couldn’t say might seem crazy or illogical at first, but over time, you start to realize that there is a need for a censor. You don’t want to walk down the street and some guy is handing out pamphlets about all children should be raped by men in their forties. No one wants to hear or see horrible things, so the government came up with a way of censoring society by putting laws into effect. Some people might say that freedom of speech should be limited to an extent while others would say that if they “the balls” to say it out loud, then they can handle the repercussions.
Freedom of speech first started out as something that was flimsy that most people wouldn’t even follow. Most of society was very strict and bigoted, but then, one of the greatest things in American history happened, the Civil Rights Era. People were finally tired of being oppressed, so they decided to break from society’s chains while following its laws. Some protests had succeeded like the Freedom Riders while others failed like Bloody Sunday (March 7, 1965) in which over 600 protestors were crossing Pettus Bridge when they were attacked by lawmen and forced to push back to Selma. In the eyes of some historians, the Civil Rights Era was the era that impacted the U.S.A the most. I myself think that the greatest impact on American history was the North American fur trade (Roussos 2-3).
Some people think that maybe freedom of speech truly isn’t something that we can control; maybe, it’s something that can be ruled over and controlled. The article “Freedom of Thought and Mental Integrity” quotes Henry David’s famous quote that says “I have paid no poll-tax for 6-years...but with superior strength.” The quote means that since the state could not stop his thoughts of not paying the poll-tax, it could punish him for acting out his thoughts. It made me think of the possibility that maybe one day the government could control what a person says or thinks so they wouldn’t go against the government's interests. It may seem crazy to believe that the government could control what a person can think or say, but it has actually happened before.
Advertisement
To this very day, peoples thoughts and actions are controlled by what the government sets as “laws.” Some of these “laws” are beneficial to society like the ban of major corporations combining together, genocide, or any other thing that could harm anything. Actions may be controlled through a lot of things like for example if you jaywalk, then you can be fined. To avoid being fined, you’re more than likely to walk on the crosswalk then running through the street and causing an accident in the process. In the article “Freedom of Thought and Mental Integrity,” it gives an example of people trying to read or see what a person is thinking/feeling by detecting brain data in the form of connection patterns and the activation of nerve cells. The process is done by setting up an AI that can interpret fMRI scans of a subject watching a video. The AI will jot down what the video made the subject feel at that moment (5).
The thought of being controlled may seem like some idea straight out of a sci-fi novel, but there were times in history where speech and actions were controlled. A term that was widely used in Russian history is censorship. The idea of saying what people can and can’t say has been one of Russia's top abilities. Russia has been a country known to everyone as The Blocked Country because of how it had blocked internet to the common person because only 8% of its population had access to the internet. An example of a country stunting the knowledge of the population is Japan. From a social experiment by a youtuber called Asian Boss, a person went around asking if people knew what a swastika was. More than half of the people asked did not know but others noticed that the symbol looked the same as a temple symbol. Later on in the video it is addressed how Japanese education has cut off some events in history because it would portray Japan in a bad light to its students.
A stunted education can lead to misinformation among the masses. Here's an example: a person that’s protesting against corrupt government officials could’ve been misinformed on what is protected by in freedom of speech. He had defecated on a national landmark and gotten arrested for indecent exposure, disorderly conduct, defacement of public property, or littering. Now that protester is in jail because they were informed that defecating and then throwing it at a statue was protected by freedom of speech. What is and isn’t protected under freedom of speech should be known to the masses but some education systems don’t have the money or time to focus on a class about rights.
The idea that maybe the right to know what your rights are seems very important because if you know then maybe you can stop something bad from happening. People may think that freedom of speech is supposed to stop bigotry and ignorance but I have seen otherwise. I was a sophomore at Ben Davis High School when one of my friends decided to wear a confederate flag t-shirt because he had wanted to show “southern pride”. I had told him that that wasn’t a good plan considering we went to a school that was predominately african american. Later on in the day, a teacher had walked up to him and told him he couldn't wear the t-shirt because it was “racist”. He had gotten into a debate with her over if a item could be “racist.” He had told her that he had no intentions of letting the scarf mean anything negative but the teacher had let her idea of “confederate flag = south = slavery = bad” take control of the situation. This had led to my friend having a meeting with the teacher, some students that felt offended by his scarf, the vice principal, and his parents, all because he had decided to show pride for a place he was from.
Freedom of speech may allow people to speak their minds but that doesn’t mean someone won’t misunderstand or disagree with what a person had said. I believe that maybe people should have the right to say whatever they want but it has to be set to a limit like you can be able to protest outside a abortion center, say that abortion is bad and have evidence on how it is bad with scientific evidence but you can’t just shame a person that had an abortion because it conflicts with your religious views. Freedom of speech should be about being willing to listen to someone else's opinion and not feeling like they had crossed a line that shouldn’t have been crossed.
Advertisement
A Wish Beyond Chaos
Knights cultivate Laws to transcend mortality. They live for centuries, leading all of humanity while ceaselessly searching for the ultimate path. Mages study Runes to control creation itself. Their lives are short, but burn with unmatched radiance, leaving marks that may never fade. Roland Crescent consumes food to continue existing. He has lived for almost fifteen years without accidentally choking to death, a feat not yet committed to chronicles and song. Five years ago, at the tender age of nine, Roland suddenly stopped dreaming and instead started seeing the imminent deaths of those around him in nightly visions. Believing himself destined for greatness, he set out to become a righteous hero of justice. But as the years passed this young wannabe savior found that his duties brought him almost no discernible benefits, whereas new burdens kept piling onto his small shoulders without end. When a longtime plan’s failure ends up opening the path to several twisted opportunities, Roland might have to finally admit to himself that nobody of importance, much less fate itself, had any regards for his heroic inclinations. Slow paced, character focused story. Gets very dark at times. Basically like Lord of the Mysteries with more comedic aspects at the start. Chapters are released Tuesday/Thursday/Saturday. Average chapter length is about 4000 words, with only the first vision being noticeably shorter. Have fun reading.
8 344It Spreads
Leena lives with her belligerent grandfather outside the old town of Icherrun. She has always been isolated from the town by her grandfather and shunned by the community. One rainy night, a young man comes to the door, and he does not seem to see anything wrong with her. In fact, he urges her to come with him as something has taken over the land. What kind of adventure will he pull her into?
8 209Ascendant: Online | Book Two | Crash Through
Ascendant: Online isn't just a game. For Antonious King, it's his life, literally. His soul torn from its body and flung fifteen hundred years into a bleak future for mankind into an augmented body made in his image, but not his own... Tony is one of three hundred humans in the Ascendant Program. One of three hundred humans left. After being confronted by The Archon, Tony finds himself back on Arach to make things right with Jorogu and drive back the Padinus Swarm, but is captured and forced to entertain through gladiatorial combat. In the face of waning powers Tony must take drastic measures to escape the grasp of the Padinus Queen, Serketzi, to fulfill the Oath sworn to avenge mankind before all of his powers are stripped away. Meet your enemies head-on and Crash Through in Ascendant: Online!
8 129The Demon Prince: Magic World
Khan La is misunderstood and feared by his peers and the general population because of his family background. He is the successor to his clan and one of the greatest prodigy to walk on the face of the planet who strive to become the strongest to protect the ones he cherished.Khan is summoned with his classmate to a new world filled with magic called Avatha where the humans are in a civil war while under the threat of the demon army invasion nearing.
8 132hope not, blackpink
... as if nothing happened, i will smile if i see you© dilemmarz | 2020
8 204Safe at Last
In the world of Lorenzo Davis', he is very paranoid. Not being able to trust anyone, he thinks that everyone is out to get him. Being a CEO, he's not only a paranoid narcissist, but a perfectionist. With having to get his way, he opposes anyone who says otherwise to his ideas. If they don't agree with him, then they're against him. One of the things that Lorenzo makes sure of is that no one knows his other lifestyle. The life he only lives at nighttime. Of course if everyone were to find out, that would not only damage his reputation, but his enemies would surely benefit from it. So Lorenzo does the one thing he knows how to do best, push everyone away. Overtime, he becomes cold, and dark. With no friends or family to speak to, he puts all of his energy into his business. He lives with the mentality that everyone will always leave him. That's until the eighteen year old Aurora Wright comes along into his life seeking a job.Aurora has always had a hard life. Dealing with the murder of her father, her abusive mother, being pimped out by her own mother, to having to raise her siblings all the while being a high school senior, would be tough on anyone. Aurora has tried her hardest to get a better life for her siblings but was unable to because of their mothers cruel ways. So being the older sibling, she had to figure out ways to make money. Some of those things she wasn't proud of, but she did it in order to provide for her, and her siblings. Throughout her entire life, she's only had help from her best friends family. So when they tell her that they've found a job for her, it's not something she expected. She also didn't expect to become the personal assistant to one of the richest, ruthless men in America with a secret that could bring down his entire corporation.
8 190